|

POSTED 22 SEPTEMBER, 2008
Will Evil
Triumph?
by Mark Huey
mark@outreachisrael.net
reproduced from the McHuey Blog
As one might imagine, our recent blog postings
over the past few weeks have generated a variety
of responses. For the great majority, it has
been helpful to get some more information about
the American political process from a Biblical
perspective. Most appreciate the encouragement
to be informed and involved in selecting our
leaders as instructed by Scripture (Deuteronomy
16:18), despite the limitations of living in a
modern-day constitutional republic rather than
an idyllic theocracy. Nevertheless, one
particular respondent with whom I have talked
has argued that not voting or voting for
principle over people outweighs voting in a
manner that has, at the very least, the
possibility of making a difference.
While pondering his sincere arguments, I was
reminded of a quote attributed to Edmund Burke,
a British philosopher of the Eighteenth Century,
who when observing the evil of the French
Revolution purportedly stated,
“All that is
necessary for the triumph of evil is that good
men do nothing.” After a number
of back and forth e-mails discussing and/or
debating our different opinions, it was apparent
to me that I was corresponding with a “good
man.’ However, I also concluded that his
position of not voting and/or voting for someone
that does not have the remotest possibility of
being elected, is synonymous with doing nothing.
Hence, the title of this blog: “Will evil
triumph?”
Additionally, I was also prompted to re-read
Romans 13, where the Apostle Paul describes our
challenge to support the authorities that govern
over us, because they are ultimately established
or allowed by a Sovereign God for His Divine
purposes. Upon ignoring the chapter breaks that
are not a part of the original epistles, I
glanced at the verses prior to ch. 13 in order
to see a fuller context of what Paul was
addressing. Interestingly, Paul was actually
acknowledging the reality of evil in the affairs
of mankind, and how the people of God are
supposed to overcome evil with good without
taking vengeance:
“Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect
what is right in the sight of all men. If
possible, so far as it depends on you, be at
peace with all men.
Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave
room for the wrath
of God,
for it is written, ‘Vengeance
is Mine, I will repay’ [Deuteronomy
32:35; Psalm 94:1], says the Lord. ‘But if your enemy is hungry, feed him, and if he is thirsty, give
him a drink; for in so doing you will heap
burning coals on his head’ [Proverbs
25:21].
Do not be
overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
Every person is to be in subjection to the
governing authorities. For there is no authority
except from God, and those which exist are
established by God. Therefore whoever resists
authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and
they who have opposed will receive condemnation
upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of
fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you
want to have no fear of authority? Do what is
good and you will have praise from the same; for
it is a minister of God to you for good.
But if you do
what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear
the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of
God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who
practices evil. Therefore it is
necessary to be in subjection, not only because
of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. For
because of this you also pay taxes, for
rulers
are servants of God, devoting themselves to this
very thing. Render to all what is due them: tax
to whom tax
is due;
custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor
to whom honor” (Romans 12:17-13:7).
Paul is a proponent of peaceful resolutions to
conflict, permitting God who is the ultimate
authority, to sort things out between the forces
of good and evil. Paul even advocates the wisdom
of rendering to those who deserve what should be
rightfully theirs—whether taxes, customs, fear,
or honor.
This statement obviously reiterates the wisdom
expressed by Yeshua Himself when He was
confronted by some Pharisees about how to deal
with the Roman taxes of First Century Judea.
These Pharisees were attempting to test the
teacher (rabbi) Yeshua. Was He going to remain
loyal to God, or submit to the laws of the
ruling government beholden to Caesar? His answer
was so profound that His accusers simply
departed in amazement without one recorded word
of condemnation:
“Then the Pharisees went and plotted together
how they might trap Him in what He said. And
they sent their disciples to Him, along with the
Herodians, saying, ‘Teacher, we know that You
are truthful and teach the way of God in truth,
and defer to no one; for You are not partial to
any. Tell us then, what do You think? Is it
lawful to give a poll-tax to Caesar, or not?’
But Yeshua perceived their malice, and said,
‘Why are you testing Me, you hypocrites? Show Me
the coin
used for the poll-tax.’ And they
brought Him a denarius. And He said to them,
‘Whose likeness and inscription is this?’ They
said to Him, ‘Caesar’s.’ Then He said to them,
‘Then
render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s;
and to God the things that are God’s.’
And hearing
this,
they were amazed, and leaving Him, they went
away” (Matthew 22:15-22).
For those of us living in the Twenty-First
Century, particularly in a country like the
United States that allows good people to
participate in the election process, the ability
to follow the rules as legislated by our society
should not be a problem. Given the facts that
both Yeshua and Paul advocated working within
the political and societal systems of their
times, it is not difficult to conclude that we
should do the same as exemplified by them.
Wisdom dictates that we do something that
matters when it comes to exercising our right to
vote. Doing something that does not matter, or
worse, doing nothing—seems to challenge not only
common sense, but the clear imperatives of
Scripture. It almost begs the question: If
Yeshua and Paul had the opportunity to vote,
would they throw away their vote or would they
choose the better of the two candidates that
have the
only chances of winning?
Obviously, both Yeshua and Paul would be
considered by any standard, “good men.” I
personally believe that they would do something
so that goodness would at least have the
possibility of triumphing over evil. As Burke
reminds us,
“When good men
do nothing, evil has a much better chance of
triumphing.”
As indicated in previous postings, informed
voting is one practical thing we recommend to
all Americans who have the privilege to vote for
our leaders. Additionally, we are encouraging a
time of fasting and praying for God’s will to be
done through this election season by those good
men and women who are so led.
On a spiritual plane, this is yet another
“something,” rather than “nothing,” that can be
done to hopefully stem the tide of evil. But no
matter what the results, ultimately our Heavenly
Father establishes every authority and allows
different governments and leaders to rule and
reign over His people. That reality was true in
the First Century, and it applies even to us
today in 2008.
If evil triumphs for a season, we know from our
reading of the Scriptures that eventually,
goodness will rule and reign from Mount Zion.
The key is maintaining our faith with wisdom
until that becomes a reality.
Finally, remember that even the Roman
philosopher and statesman Cicero said that we
all need wisdom in order to make appropriate
decisions when it comes to discerning good and
evil:
“The function of wisdom is to discriminate
between good and evil.”
Mark Huey (B.A., Vanderbilt
University in History and Graduate Studies at
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University) is the
Director of Outreach Israel Ministries (www.outreachisrael.net).
He is the author of several books, including:
TorahScope, Volumes I & II, and
Counting
the Omer: A Daily Devotional Toward Shavuot.
He is also co-author of
Hebraic Roots: An Introductory
Study.
|